Legal Summary & Consent Standards
  • Two-Party Jurisdictions: Victoria, NSW, WA, SA, Tasmania, and the ACT require all parties to consent before a private conversation or call is recorded.
  • National NDIS Ethic: Under the NDIS Code of Conduct and Privacy Act 1988, explicit affirmative consent must always be gathered, even in single-party jurisdictions like Queensland.
  • Plain-English Requirement: Consent scripting must be conversational, transparent about data storage, and free of coercive language.
  • Zero-Friction Fallback: If consent is declined, support coordinators must use post-call reflection dictation without capturing participant audio.

1. The Legal Landscape: Two-Party vs. One-Party Consent in Australia

In Australia, the legality of recording telecommunications and private conversations is governed by a patchwork of Commonwealth, State, and Territory statutes. For NDIS Support Coordinators who routinely communicate with vulnerable participants, family members, and multidisciplinary allied health teams across state borders, understanding these laws is essential.

State / Territory Governing Act Consent Requirement for Private Calls
Victoria (VIC) Surveillance Devices Act 1999 (Vic) All principal parties must consent (Two-party consent).
New South Wales (NSW) Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NSW) All parties to the conversation must consent.
Queensland (QLD) Invasion of Privacy Act 1971 (Qld) One-party consent legally permitted, but NDIS Code of Conduct mandates transparency.
Western Australia (WA) Surveillance Devices Act 1998 (WA) All parties must consent to recording private conversations.
South Australia (SA) Surveillance Devices Act 2016 (SA) All principal parties must consent.
Tasmania (TAS) Listening Devices Act 1991 (Tas) All parties must consent.
ACT & NT Listening Devices Act 1992 (ACT) / Surveillance Devices Act (NT) Consent of all parties required in ACT; NT allows one-party subject to restrictions.
The National Practice Rule for NDIS Providers

Regardless of state-level one-party exceptions (such as in Queensland), the NDIS Code of Conduct and the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) require NDIS providers to uphold participant dignity and autonomy. Under ethical standards, you must always obtain explicit affirmative consent from all parties before any recording takes place.

2. Plain-English Consent Scripts That Build Trust

Clinical and administrative language can often trigger anxiety for participants and their families. Consent protocols must be transparent, courteous, and easily understandable.

Standard Pre-Call Verbal Consent Script "Hi [Participant Name], to make sure I capture all our follow-ups accurately without having to look down at a notebook, I’m using Nueco to transcribe our call into structured notes. Are you happy for this call to be transcribed, or would you prefer we talk without recording?"

3. The Post-Call Reflection Fallback

If a participant or family member prefers not to be recorded, support coordinators must have an instantaneous fallback that preserves documentation speed without compromising compliance.

Nueco’s Post-Call Reflection Workflow allows the coordinator to click "Decline Recording." The call proceeds normally with zero audio recording. Once the call concludes, the coordinator speaks a 60-second summary directly into Nueco, which parses the dictated reflection into the identical 4-field note structure (Purpose, Discussion, Decision, Follow-up).

4. Data Storage and the Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)

Health and disability information is classified as Sensitive Information under APP 6 (Use or disclosure of personal information) and APP 11 (Security of personal information). Coordinators must ensure:

Statutory References & Australian Legislation

  1. Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) — Schedule 1 (Australian Privacy Principles 1, 6, 11).
  2. Surveillance Devices Act 1999 (Vic) — Sections 6 & 11 (Regulation of optical and listening devices).
  3. Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NSW) — Section 7 (Prohibition on installation, use and maintenance of listening devices).
  4. Surveillance Devices Act 1998 (WA) / Surveillance Devices Act 2016 (SA).
  5. NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission: NDIS Code of Conduct (Guidance for Providers and Workers).
LR

About the Author: Dr. Liam Ross

Senior Healthcare & Privacy Compliance Specialist · Nueco Legal Research

Dr. Liam Ross specializes in healthcare privacy legislation, digital consent architectures, and regulatory compliance across Australian clinical and disability support sectors.

Legally Reviewed by Marcus Vance, Senior Regulatory Advisor · Updated 23 August 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Is it legal to record phone calls with NDIS participants in Victoria and New South Wales?

In Victoria (Surveillance Devices Act 1999) and New South Wales (Surveillance Devices Act 2007), recording a private conversation requires the consent of all principal parties (two-party/all-party consent rule) unless a narrow legal exemption applies. For NDIS support coordinators, explicit upfront affirmative consent from the participant or their authorized nominee is legally required before any recording begins.

What should a support coordinator do if a participant declines call recording?

The coordinator should never pressure the participant. The platform or practitioner should immediately proceed without recording, and instead utilize post-call reflection dictation afterwards. This generates the exact same structured 4-field note (Purpose, Discussion, Decision, Follow-up) without capturing any audio from the participant.

Experience compliant, consent-first documentation

Nueco was built specifically around Australian privacy standards and NDIS Commission rules, featuring built-in consent verification and post-call reflection modes.

Join Early Access for Coordinators